Repository navigation
Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
|
(To be clear: I meant in the integration tests.) |
0 replies
0 replies
|
Yes, something like that. We want to be able to keep an eye on the cost of PSyclone processing. |
0 replies
|
I think it might also be worth having some more detailed information on what sections are expensive for our "standard" runs, e.g. are we still accurate saying its the parser or is something like |
0 replies
|
The fab build (which will be used when adding the gungho extraction tests to the CI) will also report time for each phase, including python timing. |
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We record the performance of the code processed by PSyclone but I think it would also be useful to keep an eye on the performance of PSyclone itself - i.e. how long it takes to process/build NEMO and how long it takes to process/build LFRic.
What do @sergisiso, @LonelyCat124 and @hiker think?
All reactions