Repository navigation
[agent-job-health] Agent Job Health Monitor — 2026-10-13: fleet rate 2.36%, no blind spots, no new issue #68553
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Note
Fleet is healthy. Failure rate dropped vs. the last two reports and no novel, actionable cluster meets the issue-creation bar.
Summary
in_progressat collection time were excluded from the rate)Failure Rate by Step
View per-step breakdown (7 confirmed agent-job failures)
Tracked Failures
Issue search/read was blocked by integrity policy this run (resources below "approved" integrity could not be opened). Based on this workflow's own
history.jsonl, "Execute Codex CLI" and "Execute GitHub Copilot CLI" step failures are chronic signatures that have recurred in nearly every prior report (tracked historically under issues #54242/#65950 for Codex, #54186/#55413 lineage for Copilot CLI) — treating these as likely-tracked rather than novel, pending maintainer confirmation.Novel Failure Clusters
Warm up modelstep failurePre-compute recent changes governance contextstep failureNeither cluster affects 2+ workflows or ≥10% of runs, so no new issue is being opened (see Issue Creation criteria). Recommend the maintainer spot-check these two run IDs directly.
Schedule Heartbeat
The repo has ~210 schedule-triggered workflows (205 object-form
on.schedule, 4 shorthandon: "daily"aliases, 1cooldown-prefixed form) — far more than fit in an exhaustive per-workflow Actions API check this run. Only 53 appeared in the local 24h sample; the rest were not downloaded due to the storage/count budget, not necessarily silent. A 10-workflow stratified sample (mixing daily/weekly cadence, including categories similar to the historical #53252 "audit-workflows" blind-spot precedent) was checked live via the Actions API:No blind spots detected in the sampled workflows. Full 210-workflow verification was not exhaustive given repo scale — this is the same scoping limitation noted in the 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-12 reports.
View per-workflow breakdown (failures only; full 53-workflow table omitted for brevity — all others had 0 failures)
Also observed (out of scope, noted for context)
failureconclusion while theagentjob itself reportedsuccessorskipped(e.g. Daily Spec Coverage Review, Agentic Workflow Audit Agent, PR Sous Chef, Daily Code Debt Cleanup — Aider) — these are safe-output/other-job failures, owned by the Safe Output Health Monitor..lock.ymlon the PR's own branch) rather than a fleet-wide agent regression. Excluded from the agent-job failure count.Recommendations
Warm up model, UK AI Operational Resilience governance-context step) are below the 2-workflow/10% threshold.References:
All reactions